AI War: OpenAI Launches GPT-5.2 After ‘Code Red’ to Catch Gemini 3
San Francisco – The gloves are off. OpenAI officially launched its newest models, GPT-5.2 Pro and GPT-5.2 Thinking, just weeks after Google’s Gemini 3 Pro started making serious gains, prompting an internal panic known as “code red” at OpenAI.OpenAI code red, Sam Altman, Gemini 3 Pro, GPT-5.2 Thinking, AI benchmark, professional knowledge work
This is the ultimate tech showdown: the pioneer versus the juggernaut.
The Great AI Race Flip
-
The Challenger’s Rise: Google’s Gemini 3 Pro was beating the previous ChatGPT models on multimodal tasks, reasoning, and, critically, avoiding the “hallucination” issues that had plagued the earlier iteration of ChatGPT.
-
The Code Red: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reportedly issued a “code red” to his teams, urging them to halt non-essential projects and accelerate development to keep pace with Google’s relentless innovation. OpenAI Chief of Applications Fidji Simo confirmed the “red alert” about Google sprinting ahead.
GPT-5.2’s New Weapon: Pure Reasoning
OpenAI has positioned GPT-5.2 not as a chat upgrade, but as a serious tool for “professional knowledge work,” prioritizing logic and accuracy over flashy features. The two new variants target specific needs:
-
GPT-5.2 Pro: The top-tier model for overall quality and accuracy, showing improvements in complex coding and long-context performance. On the SWE-bench Verified code test, GPT-5.2 reportedly scored 80%, slightly ahead of Gemini 3 Pro’s 76.2%.
-
GPT-5.2 Thinking: Designed specifically for deep work, math, and science. OpenAI stated, “Strong mathematical reasoning is a foundation for reliability in scientific and technical work.” It reportedly achieved a perfect 100% on its internal AIME 2025 math benchmark (without tools), compared to Gemini 3’s 95%.
The Benchmark Battle is Mixed
Early independent user tests and company-reported benchmarks show a mixed bag, indicating a truly narrow divide:
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Lead | Gemini 3 Lead |
| Math/Code Accuracy | GPT-5.2 (SWE-bench, AIME) | – |
| Science/Reasoning | GPT-5.2 (GPQA Diamond: 92.4% to 91.9%) | – |
| Multimodality | – | Gemini 3 (MMMLU: 91.8% to 89.6%) |
| Broad Reasoning | – | Gemini 3 (Humanity’s Last Exam) |
| Web Development | GPT-5.2 High (2nd on LMArena) | – |
For now, the overall picture is unclear whether OpenAI can fully reclaim the lead in the near term. The race continues, and the user benefits from this high-stakes, ultra-expensive competition.
Disclaimer: This information is based on public statements by OpenAI and Google, and early, company-reported benchmark scores. Always verify AI model performance on your specific use case.
Add Businessleague.in as a Preferred Source
We have taken all measures to ensure that the information provided in this article and on our social media platform is credible, verified and sourced from other Big media Houses. For any feedback or complaint, reach out to us at businessleaguein@gmail.com
